Gardiner v. Gardiner

60 P. 875, 7 Ariz. 73, 1900 Ariz. LEXIS 61
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided March 28, 1900·No. Civil No. 715·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have so often decided that a failure to comply with the statutory requirement as to assignments of error amounts to a waiver of all errors which are not fundamental, as to render it a work of supererogation to do more than again call attention to these rulings and the imperative requirement of the statute. In the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardiner v. Gardiner, 60 P. 875, 7 Ariz. 73, 1900 Ariz. LEXIS 61 (Ark. 1900).

60 P. 875 (Gardiner v. Gardiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouldin v. Sheerer
187 P. 568 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)
Leatherwood v. Richardson
89 P. 503 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1907)