Bouldin v. Sheerer
This text of 187 P. 568 (Bouldin v. Sheerer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4, 60 Pac. 693; Gardner v. Gardner, 7 Ariz. 73, 60 Pac. 875; Trimble et al. v. Long, 6 Ariz. 268, 56 Pac. 731; Daggs et al. v. Field, 6 Ariz. 47, 52 Pac. 773; Daggs et al. v. Hoskins et al., 5 Ariz. 236, 52 Pac. 350; Putnam v. Putnam, 3 Ariz. 182, 24 Pac. 320.; Wolfley v. Gila River Irr. Co., 3 Ariz. 176, 24 Pac. 257.
[248]*248The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced. '
The appeal in this case is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 P. 568, 21 Ariz. 247, 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouldin-v-sheerer-ariz-1920.