Gardiner v. City of New York

2023 NY Slip Op 01138
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2023
DocketIndex No. 22995/14 Appeal No. 17436 Case No. 2022-01144
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 01138 (Gardiner v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardiner v. City of New York, 2023 NY Slip Op 01138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Gardiner v City of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 01138)
Gardiner v City of New York
2023 NY Slip Op 01138
Decided on March 02, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 02, 2023
Before: Renwick, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Singh, Higgitt, JJ.

Index No. 22995/14 Appeal No. 17436 Case No. 2022-01144

[*1]Misha Gardiner, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

City of New York, Defendant, Mr. Transportation, Inc. Doing Business as Marquis Ambulette, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff,

v

Mr. Transportation, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendant-Respondents.


Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C., New York (Anthony Makarov of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New York (Dean L. Pillarella of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered February 15, 2022, which, in this action for personal injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied plaintiff's motion because the record presents triable issues of fact as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff should have seen defendants' vehicle as she was approaching the intersection (see Luciano-Mahoney v Rossman, 191 AD3d 604, 605 [1st Dept 2021]; Nevarez v S.R.M. Mgt. Corp., 58 AD3d 295, 298 [1st Dept 2008]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 2, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardiner v. City of New York
2023 NY Slip Op 01138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 01138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardiner-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2023.