Garcia v. Valladares

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garcia v. Valladares

99 So. 3d 518, 2011 WL 2500007, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 2011

DocketNo. 3D10-1538

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 99 So. 3d 518 (Garcia v. Valladares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garcia v. Valladares, 99 So. 3d 518, 2011 WL 2500007, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Maria Garcia, appeals from a non-final order finding entitlement to costs and attorney fees, pursuant to section 744.331(7)(c), Florida Statutes (2010). Because the order, however, does not determine the amount of such fees or costs, the order is a non-final, non-appealable order. See De La Espriella, v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 970 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Lasco Enters., Inc. v. Kohlbrand, 819 So.2d 821, 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Gonzalez Eng’g, Inc. v. Miami Pump & Supply Co., 641 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Indeed, the order appealed reserves jurisdiction to determine the amount at a future hearing. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Maria Garcia, appeals from a non-final order finding entitlement to costs and attorney fees, pursuant to section 744.331(7)(c), Florida Statutes (2010). Because the order, however, does not determine the amount of such fees or costs, the order is a non-final, non-appealable order. See De La Espriella, v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 970 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Lasco Enters., Inc. v. Kohlbrand, 819 So.2d 821, 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Gonzalez Eng’g, Inc. v. Miami Pump & Supply Co., 641 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Indeed, the order appealed reserves jurisdiction to determine the amount at a future hearing. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 3d 518, 2011 WL 2500007, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-valladares-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack