Garcia v. United States

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 5, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00093·Unknown

Opinion

RUFINA HILARIO GARCIA, et al., ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00093 NONE JLT ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OR COURT ) TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND TO v. ) CLOSE THIS ACTION

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., ) ) (Doc. 52) Defendant. ) )

The parties have stipulated, according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1), to dismiss this action with prejudice with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 52). Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge for the purpose of closing this case and then to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 5, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. United States, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Garcia v. United States (Garcia v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)