Garcia v. Spun Steak Co.

13 F.3d 296, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9586, 93 Daily Journal DAR 16601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33530, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,814, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 1993 WL 530780
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1993
DocketNo. 91-16733
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 F.3d 296 (Garcia v. Spun Steak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 13 F.3d 296, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9586, 93 Daily Journal DAR 16601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33530, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,814, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 1993 WL 530780 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinions

The order filed October 29, 1993, with dissent, is ordered published.

The panel, with Judge Boochever dissenting, has voted to deny appellees’ petition for rehearing. Judges Noonan and O’Scannlain have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Boochever has recommended acceptance of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.RApp.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F.3d 296, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9586, 93 Daily Journal DAR 16601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33530, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,814, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 1993 WL 530780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-spun-steak-co-ca9-1993.