Home/Ninth Circuit/Garcia v. Spun Steak Co.

Garcia v. Spun Steak Co.

13 F.3d 296, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9586, 93 Daily Journal DAR 16601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33530, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,814, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 1993 WL 530780
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 27, 1993·No. No. 91-16733·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

The order filed October 29, 1993, with dissent, is ordered published.

The panel, with Judge Boochever dissenting, has voted to deny appellees’ petition for rehearing. Judges Noonan and O’Scannlain have voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Boochever has recommended acceptance of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.RApp.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 13 F.3d 296, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9586, 93 Daily Journal DAR 16601, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33530, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,814, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1162, 1993 WL 530780 (9th Cir. 1993).

13 F.3d 296 (Garcia v. Spun Steak Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballantyne v. Guenther Management LLC
E.D. Washington, 2025
Piroli v. Sessions
Second Circuit, 2018
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Premier Operator Services, Inc.
113 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (N.D. Texas, 2000)
63 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1162, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,814 Priscilla Garcia Maricela Buitrago United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. Spun Steak Company, a California Corporation
13 F.3d 296 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)