Garcia v. Rivkind

639 So. 2d 177, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6611, 1994 WL 316355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1994
DocketNos. 94-705, 94-806
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 639 So. 2d 177 (Garcia v. Rivkind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Rivkind, 639 So. 2d 177, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6611, 1994 WL 316355 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petitioners, who are defendants in county court prosecutions for simple battery which involve domestic violence, seek the issuance of writ of mandamus requiring the respondent chief judge of the Eleventh Circuit to set aside Administrative Orders 92-48 and 92-49. We grant the petitions.

The orders in question purported to establish a domestic violence “department” of the Criminal Division of the Dade County Court, to which the petitioners’ cases are assigned, and the Family Division of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit. It is obvious that, however denominated, they create a specialized subject matter-related division of the trial courts which, under article V, section 7, Florida Constitution, and section 43.30, Florida Statutes, may be accomplished only by local rule, duly approved by the supreme court in accordance with Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.050(e)(1). Administrative Order, Fourth Judicial Circuit (Division of Courts), 378 So.2d 286 (Fla.1979); In re Report of the Comm’n on Family Courts, 588 So.2d 586 (Fla.1991); see State ex rel. Zuberi v. Brinker, 323 So.2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Compare Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.050(b)(3) & (4). Mandamus is granted and the administrative orders under review are therefore quashed.

To avoid disruption in the judicial administration of the courts in Dade County, by permitting application for the adoption of an appropriate local rule on the subject, we withhold issuance of the peremptory writ and allow the orders to remain in effect for thirty days, and thereafter for such time as the supreme court may allow.

Mandamus granted.

JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivkind v. Garcia
650 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Hartley v. State
650 So. 2d 1044 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
In Re Report of Com'n on Family Courts
646 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 177, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6611, 1994 WL 316355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-rivkind-fladistctapp-1994.