Garcia v. Holder

512 F. App'x 719
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2013
Docket08-70477
StatusUnpublished

This text of 512 F. App'x 719 (Garcia v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Holder, 512 F. App'x 719 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Jose Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Aguiluz-Arellano v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 980, 983 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly found Garcia removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) based on his guilty plea conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11377(a) for possession of a controlled substance where the record of conviction establishes that the controlled substance underlying Garcia’s conviction was methamphetamine. See Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir.2011) (“We have permitted reliance on an abstract of judgment in combination with a charging document to establish that the defendant pled guilty to a generic crime under the modified categorical approach.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder
645 F.3d 1035 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F. App'x 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-holder-ca9-2013.