Home/Ninth Circuit/Garber v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

Garber v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

281 F. App'x 687, 281 Fed. Appx. 687, 281 F. App’x 687, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12177, 2008 WL 2276661
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2008·No. No. 06-15570·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

The Garbers did not file their notice of appeal within 30 days after the judgment in the district court was entered, as required by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). National Union’s motion to amend the district court order did not toll the thirty day time limit because the motion addressed a collateral and independent issue from the merits of the case.1

[688] Even if the appeal was not filed late, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by authorizing payment to National Union from the bankruptcy estate nunc pro tunc. National Union satisfactorily explained its failure to obtain prior judicial approval and demonstrated that its services benefitted the bankrupt estate in a significant manner.2

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garber v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 281 F. App'x 687, 281 Fed. Appx. 687, 281 F. App’x 687, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12177, 2008 WL 2276661 (9th Cir. 2008).

281 F. App'x 687 (Garber v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.
485 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1988)
David G. Lupo and James A. Stemmler, Jack D. Bastien, Arthur F. O'hare, Jane S. Tschudy, E. Louis Werner, Jr., Michael J. Kickham, Arla E. Reed, Thomas W. Yager and Ronald B. Burt v. R. Rowland and Company, a Missouri Corporation, Joseph G. Wohl, Carol Wohl and David Weiss, Executors, Irwin M. Rosenthal, Jacob W. Heller, Herman Schwartzman, Leonard I. Weinstock, David M. Garelik, Andrew W. Dave, Marcel Shwergold and Elkan Abramowitz, Edmond M. Coller, Richard F. Horowitz, Howard L. Mann, E. Cooke Rand, Howard S. Jacobs, R. Mitchell Mass, Edward Fingerman, Weiss, Rosenthal, Heller & Schwartzman, a Dissolved Legal Partnership, Laventhol & Horwath, an Accounting Partnership, Richard W.A. Davis, Richard W.A. Davis, as Trustee for Richard W.A. Davis, Inc., a Dissolved Florida Corporation, Harold Rand, Harold Rand, D/B/A Harold Rand & Company Public Relations, Joel Preston, Irving Cohen, Irving Cohen, D/B/A the Astro Group, Ltd., I.C.A. Productions, Inc., a Dissolved New York Corporation, Stanley Levine, Ted Shapiro, Ted Shapiro, D/B/A the Astro Group, Ltd., Raymond E. Rowland, Jr., Robert R. Rust, David G. Lupo and James A. Stemmler, Jack D. Bastien, Arthur F. O'hare, Jane S. Tschudy, E. Louis Werner, Jr., Michael J. Kickham, Arla E. Reed, Thomas W. Yager and Ronald B. Burt v. R. Rowland and Company, a Missouri Corporation, Joseph G. Wohl, Carol Wohl and David Weiss, Executors, Irwin M. Rosenthal, Jacob W. Heller, Herman Schwartzman, Leonard I. Weinstock, David M. Garelik, Andrew W. Dave, Marcel Shwergold and Elkan Abramowitz, Edmond M. Coller, Richard F. Horowitz, Howard L. Mann, E. Cooke Rand, Howard S. Jacobs, R. Mitchell Mass, Edward Fingerman, Weiss, Rosenthal, Heller & Schwartzman, a Dissolved Legal Partnership, Laventhol & Horwath, an Accounting Partnership, Richard W.A. Davis, Richard W.A. Davis, as Trustee for Richard W.A. Davis, Inc., a Dissolved Florida Corporation, Harold Rand, Harold Rand, D/B/A Harold Rand & Company Public Relations, Joel Preston, Irving Cohen, Irving Cohen, D/B/A the Astro Group, Ltd., I.C.A. Productions, Inc., a Dissolved New York Corporation, Stanley Levine, Ted Shapiro, Ted Shapiro, D/B/A the Astro Group, Ltd., Raymond E. Rowland, Jr., Robert R. Rust
857 F.2d 482 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
In Re Howard Atkins Romie Atkins, Debtors. Howard Atkins, Dba Coyote Health Center v. Wain, Samuel & Co.
69 F.3d 970 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Leslie v. Grupo ICA
198 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)