Gantz v. Hames

332 A.2d 132, 114 R.I. 924, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1516
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 30, 1975·No. Appeal No. 1844·Published

Opinion

Motion of appellee to affirm the judgment below under Rule 16(g), as amended, is denied. Motion to withdraw said motion is denied as being moot. Motion of appellee for an extension of time to January 31, 1975 in which to file brief is granted. Motion of plaintiff-appellant to strike the brief of defendant[925]*925appellee is granted;

Aram K. Berberian, for plaintiff-appellant. Steven S. Saber, Asst. City Solicitor, for defendant-appellee. Paolino and Joslin, JJ. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gantz v. Hames, 332 A.2d 132, 114 R.I. 924, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1516 (R.I. 1975).

332 A.2d 132 (Gantz v. Hames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.