Gantz v. Hames

332 A.2d 132, 114 R.I. 924, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1516
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJanuary 30, 1975
DocketAppeal No. 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 332 A.2d 132 (Gantz v. Hames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gantz v. Hames, 332 A.2d 132, 114 R.I. 924, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1516 (R.I. 1975).

Opinion

Motion of appellee to affirm the judgment below under Rule 16(g), as amended, is denied. Motion to withdraw said motion is denied as being moot. Motion of appellee for an extension of time to January 31, 1975 in which to file brief is granted. Motion of plaintiff-appellant to strike the brief of defendant[925]*925appellee is granted;

Aram K. Berberian, for plaintiff-appellant. Steven S. Saber, Asst. City Solicitor, for defendant-appellee. Paolino and Joslin, JJ. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 A.2d 132, 114 R.I. 924, 1975 R.I. LEXIS 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gantz-v-hames-ri-1975.