Gant v. State

739 So. 2d 734, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12181, 1999 WL 743549
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 682 So. 2d 1137
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1999·No. No. 98-2102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues on appeal. As to the first two issues, we affirm. Woods v. State, 733 So.2d 980 (Fla.1999); Bozeman v. State, 714 So.2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

On the third issue concerning sentencing as an habitual offender for petit theft, we remand for resentencing only. Baker v. State, 724 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Appellant need not be present for resen-tencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gant v. State, 739 So. 2d 734, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12181, 1999 WL 743549 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 734 (Gant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bozeman v. State
714 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Woods v. State
733 So. 2d 980 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Baker v. State
724 So. 2d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)