Gant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gant v. State

696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8153, 1997 WL 394839

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 1997

DocketNo. 96-00449

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 1293 (Gant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gant v. State, 696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8153, 1997 WL 394839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Gant challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon him for the offenses of battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer with violence, fleeing to elude, and driving while hcense is suspended or revoked. We affirm the judgments and sentences except for the imposition of the pubhc defender hen. The record shows that the trial court did not advise Gant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). Faircloth v. State, 686 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

We remand the ease with instructions that Gant be given thirty days to file a written objection to the amount of the lien. If he files an objection, the trial court must strike the lien and it may impose a new hen provided that Gant is afforded the required notice and hearing. Halyard v. State, 667 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Gant challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon him for the offenses of battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer with violence, fleeing to elude, and driving while hcense is suspended or revoked. We affirm the judgments and sentences except for the imposition of the pubhc defender hen. The record shows that the trial court did not advise Gant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). Faircloth v. State, 686 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

We remand the ease with instructions that Gant be given thirty days to file a written objection to the amount of the lien. If he files an objection, the trial court must strike the lien and it may impose a new hen provided that Gant is afforded the required notice and hearing. Halyard v. State, 667 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8153, 1997 WL 394839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gant-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack