Gant v. State

696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8153, 1997 WL 394839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 1180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 1997·No. No. 96-00449·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Gant challenges the judgments and sentences imposed upon him for the offenses of battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer with violence, fleeing to elude, and driving while hcense is suspended or revoked. We affirm the judgments and sentences except for the imposition of the pubhc defender hen. The record shows that the trial court did not advise Gant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). Faircloth v. State, 686 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

We remand the ease with instructions that Gant be given thirty days to file a written objection to the amount of the lien. If he files an objection, the trial court must strike the lien and it may impose a new hen provided that Gant is afforded the required notice and hearing. Halyard v. State, 667 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gant v. State, 696 So. 2d 1293, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8153, 1997 WL 394839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

696 So. 2d 1293 (Gant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halyard v. State
667 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Faircloth v. State
686 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)