Gallop v. Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Teresa Gallop, Civ. No. 25-159 (JWB/ECW)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Federal Bureau of Prisons and Segal, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Warden,
Respondents.
United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on August 8, 2025. (Doc. No. 14.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The August 8, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Petitioner Teresa Gallop’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: September 4, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gallop v. Bureau of Prisons (Gallop v. Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.