Galeas v. Neely

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7709

JORGE GALEAS, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DELMAS M. BURCH; RYAN SHIPWASH; TRAVIS LOCKLEAR; ARTIS TAMAR PERKINS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RICHARD NEELY,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00599-RJC)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorge Galeas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action

without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Galeas v. Neely, No. 3:10-cv-00599-RJC

(W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED