Galeas v. Neely
This text of Galeas v. Neely (Galeas v. Neely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7709
JORGE GALEAS, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DELMAS M. BURCH; RYAN SHIPWASH; TRAVIS LOCKLEAR; ARTIS TAMAR PERKINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
RICHARD NEELY,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00599-RJC)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Galeas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action
without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Galeas v. Neely, No. 3:10-cv-00599-RJC
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Galeas v. Neely, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galeas-v-neely-ca4-2011.