Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Gaither v. State

Gaither v. State

216 S.E.2d 324, 234 Ga. 465, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1163
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 20, 1975
Docket29863
StatusPublished
Cited by56 cases

This text of 216 S.E.2d 324 (Gaither v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaither v. State, 216 S.E.2d 324, 234 Ga. 465, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1163 (Ga. 1975).

Opinions

Per curiam.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of murder. The trial court granted a motion for new trial on the conviction for the offense of aggravated assault and overruled the motion as to the murder conviction.

While in conflict, there is evidence to show that the defendant went to the house of one Gary Rose, his seventeen-year-old friend. The two talked of getting some money as they drank beer and took pills, all of which were provided by defendant. They then went looking for [466]*466someone to rob. Upon seeing a man walking on the sidewalk with a bag of groceries, defendant handed Rose a gun and told him to "go ahead.” Rose approached the man and asked for money. A scuffle ensued and Rose shot and killed the man. Both Rose and the defendant fled.

1. The evidence supports the verdict of guilty on the indictment for murder by malice aforethought based upon a conspiracy. Jones v. State, 220 Ga. 899 (142 SE2d 801). See also Code Ann. § 26-801.

2. The defendant enumerates error in the following charge of the court on the guilt phase of the trial: "Whatever your verdict is, ladies and gentlemen, it must be in writing, it must be dated and signed by your foreman or forewoman and returned into court. I suggest that you just open each of these indictments and write your verdict at the top of this page, because later on in the sentencing feature of the case, you will have to write the sentencing feature in the bottom part of the page. So, if you will, write them at the top of this page on each of the indictments with reference to all of these counts.” He contends that the charge expressed the opinion of the trial court to the jury that the defendant was guilty of the crimes charged.

The state contends that he waived any objection to the charge by virtue of the fact that at the conclusion of the charge the trial judge asked the defendant’s counsel if there were any objections to the charge and counsel replied, "I will reserve my objections to the charge for motion for new trial.” We disagree. "Under the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, p. 1072,1078), an appellant in a criminal case may appeal and enumerate error on an erroneous charge or on erroneous failure to charge without first raising the issue in the trial court. Spear v. State, 230 Ga. 74 (195 SE2d 397). The benefits of this rule are not deemed waived by defendant even where his counsel states to the trial judge that he has no objection to the charge of the court.” Sims v. State, 234 Ga. 177, 178.

It is error for a trial judge "to express or intimate his opinion as to what has or has not been proved, or as to the guilt of the accused.” Code § 81-1104. See Nixon v. State, 14 Ga. App. 261, 263 (80 SE 513). A new trial is mandatory. Neal v. State, 217 Ga. 545 (123 SE2d 760).

[467]*467Submitted April 21, 1975 Decided May 20, 1975. Myers, Mull & Sweet, Gale W. Mull, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Allen Moye, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Lois F. Oakley, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur in Division 1, except Gunter and Ingram, JJ. All the Justices concur in Division 2, except Hall, J., who dissents from Division 2 and the judgment of reversal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. State
725 S.E.2d 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Baptiste v. State
706 S.E.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
Sweet v. State
697 S.E.2d 246 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Hobbs v. State
682 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Leggon v. State
549 S.E.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Moon v. State
535 S.E.2d 771 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Smith v. State
485 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)
Thomas v. State
482 S.E.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Sims v. State
467 S.E.2d 574 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Dukes v. State
423 S.E.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Concepcion v. State
408 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Towns v. State
396 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1990)
Mullen v. State
397 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Edwards v. State
391 S.E.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Boatwright v. State
387 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Hills v. State
379 S.E.2d 626 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Cooper v. State
372 S.E.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Wadley v. State
357 S.E.2d 588 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1987)
Harper v. State
348 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Thackston v. State
343 S.E.2d 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 S.E.2d 324, 234 Ga. 465, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaither-v-state-ga-1975.