Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 312, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1182
United States Customs Court·Decided December 3, 1953·No. No. 57655; protests 208957-K and 208261-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 312, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1182 (cusc 1953).

31 Cust. Ct. 312 (Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 40 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 44 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)