Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 375, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 170
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 12, 1953
DocketNo. 57140; protests 196546-K and 196547-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 375 (Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gaillet & Hartig Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 375, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 170 (cusc 1953).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellophane sheets similar in all material respects to> those the subject of Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 40, C. D. 1345) and Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States (27 Cust. Ct. 44, C. D. 1346). the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coughlin Mfg. Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 40 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. United States
27 Cust. Ct. 44 (U.S. Customs Court, 1951)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 Cust. Ct. 375, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaillet-hartig-co-v-united-states-cusc-1953.