Gaillard v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Gaillard v. Board of Appeals

372 N.E.2d 275, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 834

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedJanuary 26, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 372 N.E.2d 275 (Gaillard v. Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaillard v. Board of Appeals, 372 N.E.2d 275, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 834 (Mass. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties agreed at oral argument that the governing statute in this matter is G. L. c. 40A, § 21, as in effect prior to St. 1975, c. 808, § 3. We assume, without deciding, the correctness of their view, and conclude that it was error to dismiss the complaint because it was apparent from the face of the complaint that the plaintiffs might be entitled to some relief. Mass.R.Civ.P. 8(a), 365 Mass. 749 (1974). See Charbonnier v. Amico, 367 Mass. 146, 152-153 (1975) . Moreover, as there was no need in the circumstances to plead the statute relied on, it was not fatal for the plaintiffs to cite a version of G. L. c. 40A, § 21, which the parties now agree was inapplicable. Cf. Springfield v. Commonwealth, 349 Mass. 267, 270 (1965). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint in the Superior Court within forty days of the date of the rescript. The defendants may then move or answer according to the rules.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties agreed at oral argument that the governing statute in this matter is G. L. c. 40A, § 21, as in effect prior to St. 1975, c. 808, § 3. We assume, without deciding, the correctness of their view, and conclude that it was error to dismiss the complaint because it was apparent from the face of the complaint that the plaintiffs might be entitled to some relief. Mass.R.Civ.P. 8(a), 365 Mass. 749 (1974). See Charbonnier v. Amico, 367 Mass. 146, 152-153 (1975) . Moreover, as there was no need in the circumstances to plead the statute relied on, it was not fatal for the plaintiffs to cite a version of G. L. c. 40A, § 21, which the parties now agree was inapplicable. Cf. Springfield v. Commonwealth, 349 Mass. 267, 270 (1965). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint in the Superior Court within forty days of the date of the rescript. The defendants may then move or answer according to the rules.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 N.E.2d 275, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaillard-v-board-of-appeals-massappct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack