Gagne v. Vaccaro
This text of 39 A.3d 1118 (Gagne v. Vaccaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. William GAGNE, Jr.
v.
Enrico VACCARO.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Peter A. Ventre, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Eugene A. Skowronski, Ansonia, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 431, 35 A.3d 380, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 51-183c required the trial court to recuse itself from presiding over the hearing on the plaintiffs motion for attorney's fees?"
PALMER and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.3d 1118, 304 Conn. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gagne-v-vaccaro-conn-2012.