Gagne v. Vaccaro

39 A.3d 1118, 304 Conn. 907
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 14, 2012·No. SC 18937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

39 A.3d 1118 (2012)
304 Conn. 907

J. William GAGNE, Jr.
v.
Enrico VACCARO.

SC 18937.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 14, 2012.

Peter A. Ventre, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Eugene A. Skowronski, Ansonia, in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 431, 35 A.3d 380, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 51-183c required the trial court to recuse itself from presiding over the hearing on the plaintiffs motion for attorney's fees?"

PALMER and McLACHLAN, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gagne v. Vaccaro, 39 A.3d 1118, 304 Conn. 907 (Colo. 2012).

39 A.3d 1118 (Gagne v. Vaccaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gagne v. Vaccaro
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
Hammond v. Hammond
76 A.3d 688 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
D'Ascanio v. Toyota Industries Corporation
39 A.3d 1118 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)