D'Ascanio v. Toyota Industries Corporation
This text of 39 A.3d 1118 (D'Ascanio v. Toyota Industries Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Emilio D'ASCANIO et al.
v.
TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Paul D. Williams, Erich M. Sandler and James E. Hennessey, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Jack G. Steigelfest, Hartford, in opposition.
The petition by the defendants Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., BT Prime Mover, Inc., and Summit Handling Systems, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 420, 35 A.3d 388, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court's exclusion of *1119 expert testimony and refusal to grant a mistrial constituted an abuse of discretion?''
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.3d 1118, 304 Conn. 907, 2012 WL 1216122, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dascanio-v-toyota-industries-corporation-conn-2012.