Gage v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Gage v. State

615 So. 2d 1247, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, 1993 WL 10918

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gage v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 615 So. 2d 1245 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 22, 1993·No. CR-91-790·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Carl Demetrius Gage, appealed from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that a hearing could be held on the appellant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Gage v. State, 615 So.2d 1246 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). The case action summary sheet reflects that the appellant was paroled before our remand of this cause and that he failed to appear at the hearing on the petition. Because the appellant has failed to proceed with this appeal, it is hereby dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Carl Demetrius Gage, appealed from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that a hearing could be held on the appellant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Gage v. State, 615 So.2d 1246 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). The case action summary sheet reflects that the appellant was paroled before our remand of this cause and that he failed to appear at the hearing on the petition. Because the appellant has failed to proceed with this appeal, it is hereby dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Gage v. State, 615 So. 2d 1247, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, 1993 WL 10918 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

615 So. 2d 1247 (Gage v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related