Gage v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Gage v. State

615 So. 2d 1245, 1992 WL 136385

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 12, 1992

DocketCR-91-790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 1245 (Gage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gage v. State, 615 So. 2d 1245, 1992 WL 136385 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Carl Demetrius Gage, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant alleged numerous grounds for relief in his petition. No response to his petition was made by the state and no grounds for its denial were cited by the trial court. The state filed a motion to suspend the time for filing its brief, citing Rule 2(b), A.R.App.P., and requested that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Mobile County so that that court may order the district attorney’s office to respond to the appellant’s petition. The state’s request is granted. This cause is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court for Mobile County for proceedings consistent with this opinion. • Return to this court should be filed within 60 days.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Carl Demetrius Gage, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant alleged numerous grounds for relief in his petition. No response to his petition was made by the state and no grounds for its denial were cited by the trial court. The state filed a motion to suspend the time for filing its brief, citing Rule 2(b), A.R.App.P., and requested that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Mobile County so that that court may order the district attorney’s office to respond to the appellant’s petition. The state’s request is granted. This cause is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court for Mobile County for proceedings consistent with this opinion. • Return to this court should be filed within 60 days.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 So. 2d 1245, 1992 WL 136385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-state-alacrimapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack