Gage v. Carraher

Supreme Court

Gage v. Carraher

154 U.S. 656, 14 S. Ct. 1190, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 12, 1880·No. No. 243·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this cause to the state court is affirmed qn the authority of Meyer v. Construction Co., 100 U. S. 457. • Carraher occupies one side of the controversy about which the suit is brought, that is to say, the title to the property in question* and Portia Gage, Henry H. Gage and John Forsythe the other. Henry H. Gage and Forsythe are citizens of the same State with Carraher. There is no controversy in the suit which is wholly between citizens of different States and which can be fully determined as between them. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this cause to the state court is affirmed qn the authority of Meyer v. Construction Co., 100 U. S. 457. • Carraher occupies one side of the controversy about which the suit is brought, that is to say, the title to the property in question* and Portia Gage, Henry H. Gage and John Forsythe the other. Henry H. Gage and Forsythe are citizens of the same State with Carraher. There is no controversy in the suit which is wholly between citizens of different States and which can be fully determined as between them. Affirmed.

Gage v. Carraher, 154 U.S. 656, 14 S. Ct. 1190, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549 (1880).

Pincite

154 U.S. 656 (Gage v. Carraher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related