Gage v. Carraher

154 U.S. 656, 14 S. Ct. 1190, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 12, 1880
DocketNo. 243
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 154 U.S. 656 (Gage v. Carraher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gage v. Carraher, 154 U.S. 656, 14 S. Ct. 1190, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549 (1880).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this cause to the state court is affirmed qn the authority of Meyer v. Construction Co., 100 U. S. 457. • Carraher occupies one side of the controversy about which the suit is brought, that is to say, the title to the property in question* and Portia Gage, Henry H. Gage and John Forsythe the other. Henry H. Gage and Forsythe are citizens of the same State with Carraher. There is no controversy in the suit which is wholly between citizens of different States and which can be fully determined as between them. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
11 F. Supp. 937 (S.D. New York, 1935)
Rockmore v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins.
65 F.2d 341 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.
264 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Danks v. Gordon
272 F. 821 (Second Circuit, 1921)
Raphael v. Trask
118 F. 777 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1902)
Yarnell v. Felton
102 F. 369 (E.D. Tennessee, 1900)
Yarnell v. Felton
104 F. 161 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 U.S. 656, 14 S. Ct. 1190, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gage-v-carraher-scotus-1880.