Gaede v. State
This text of 2015 ND 160 (Gaede v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/1/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 160
Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20150026
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; on brief.
Gaede v. State
[¶1] Dennis Gaede appeals from a district court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief on his conviction for the murder of Timothy Wicks. Gaede argues the district court erred in denying him post-conviction relief, because he presented newly discovered evidence which was material to the issues at trial and the weight and quality of the newly discovered evidence would likely result in an acquittal. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3), concluding that after holding an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied Gaede’s post-conviction relief application on the basis of findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and the district court order is supported by substantial evidence.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaede-v-state-nd-2015.