Gadsden v. . Woodward

8 N.E. 653, 103 N.Y. 242, 3 N.Y. St. Rep. 102, 58 Sickels 242, 1886 N.Y. LEXIS 1053
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 5, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 8 N.E. 653 (Gadsden v. . Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gadsden v. . Woodward, 8 N.E. 653, 103 N.Y. 242, 3 N.Y. St. Rep. 102, 58 Sickels 242, 1886 N.Y. LEXIS 1053 (N.Y. 1886).

Opinion

Rapallo, J.

The Code of Civil Procedure provides that the verification of an answer may be omitted (where not otherwise expressly prescribed), where the party pleading would *244 be privileged from testifying as a witness concerning an allegation or denial contained in the pleading. (§ 523.)

Section 837 declares that a witness shall not be required to give an answer which will tend to expose him to a penalty or forfeiture.

This action is brought against the defendant to recover a debt due by a manufacturing corporation of which he was a trustee, and he is sought to be made hable therefor on the ground that he failed to make the annual report required by the general manufacturing law. The action is not to recover a debt which he owes, but to impose upon him, as a penalty for his default, the payment of the debt of the corporation.

We have repeatedly held that such an action is an action for a penalty, or forfeiture. Any admission which he might make in his answer, in support of the plaintiff’s allegations, would, therefore, necessarily tend to expose him to a penalty. (Mer chants’ Bank v. Bliss, 35 N. Y. 412. Veeder v. Baker, 83 id. 156; Stokes v. Stickney, 96 id. 326.)

The liability sought to be enforced against the defendant does not arise out of any contract obligation but is imposed by the statute-as a penalty for disobedience of its requirement.

The distinction between the nature of this liability and that of stockholders under the same statute is clearly pointed out in Wiles v. Suydam (64 N. Y. 173), and Veeder v. Baker (83 id. 156, 160).

This action is not founded on any debt owing by the defendant. The debts owing by the company are made the measure the penalty.

The orders should be reversed and the motion granted with costs in the court'below and one bill of costs in this court.

All concur.

Orders reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co. v. Martineau
153 N.W. 416 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
In re Cullinan
82 A.D. 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. Stringer
75 A.D. 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. Stringer
76 N.Y.S. 303 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Matter of Peck v. . Cargill
60 N.E. 775 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Eads v. Orcutt
79 Mo. App. 511 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Noble v. Euler
20 A.D. 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Staub v. Henry
18 Misc. 99 (New York Supreme Court, 1896)
National Bank v. . Dillingham
42 N.E. 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
Novelty Manuf'g Co. v. Connell
34 N.Y.S. 717 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Globe Publishing Co. v. State Bank
59 N.W. 683 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Robinson v. Fay
19 N.Y.S. 120 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Rogers v. . Decker
30 N.E. 571 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Rogers v. Decker
16 N.Y.S. 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Wallace & Sons v. Walsh
3 Silv. Ct. App. 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Langdon v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
11 N.Y.S. 514 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Franks v. Reimer
9 N.Y.S. 273 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.E. 653, 103 N.Y. 242, 3 N.Y. St. Rep. 102, 58 Sickels 242, 1886 N.Y. LEXIS 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gadsden-v-woodward-ny-1886.