Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

GABRIEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND TRACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, SNAPTRACK, INC., AND NORMAN KRASNER, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2013-1058 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 08-CV-1992, Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MICHAEL E. SALZMAN, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was RONALD ABRAMSON. Of counsel was PETER A. SULLIVAN.

TIMOTHY S. TETER, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, Califor- nia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JEFFREY S. KARR and LORI R. MASON, of Palo Alto, California, and STEVEN M. STRAUSS, of San Diego, California. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court