Gable v. State

15 So. 2d 600, 245 Ala. 53
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 28, 1943
Docket1 Div. 208.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 15 So. 2d 600 (Gable v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gable v. State, 15 So. 2d 600, 245 Ala. 53 (Ala. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not find ourselves in accord with the suggestion in the opinion of the Court of Appeals that the remark of the solicitor as to the failure of one of the defendants to testify did not infringe on our statute. Code 1940, Title 15, Sec. 305; Kilpatrick v. State, 213 Ala. 358, 104 So. 656. But considering the remark improper, we are persuaded the opinion discloses that the trial court in regard thereto applied a timely and appropriate corrective, .and, of consequence, no error to reverse appears.

No other portion of the opinion calls for comment. The writ is due to be denied.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamberth v. State
307 So. 2d 43 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Fuller v. State
198 So. 2d 625 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1966)
Berness v. State
83 So. 2d 607 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Broadway v. State
60 So. 2d 701 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Coats v. State
60 So. 2d 257 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Robertson v. State
53 So. 2d 575 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Kelley v. State
26 So. 2d 633 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)
Troup v. State
26 So. 2d 611 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 So. 2d 600, 245 Ala. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gable-v-state-ala-1943.