Gable v. Silver
This text of 264 So. 2d 418 (Gable v. Silver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David GABLE, Petitioner,
v.
David SILVER et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Earl Faircloth and Robert M. Sturrup, of Faircloth, Sturrup & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Merle Litman, of Litman & Muchnick, Hollywood, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 258 So.2d 11. The District Court has certified its decision as one passing on a question of great public interest, to-wit:
"Do implied warranties of fitness and merchantability extend to the purchasers of new condominium homes from builder-sellers."
*419 After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly decided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court.
Accordingly, certiorari is discharged.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 So. 2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gable-v-silver-fla-1972.