Gabel v. Page

4 Cal. App. 509
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 3, 1906
DocketCiv. No. 324
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cal. App. 509 (Gabel v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gabel v. Page, 4 Cal. App. 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

SMITH, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal. The transcript was filed within the time allowed by the order of the court extending the time; and this order cannot be attacked on a motion to dismiss; nor, were it otherwise, have we any reason to be dissatisfied with it. It has always been the practice of this court to be liberal in extending the time for filing transcripts or briefs in eases where no delay in the hearing of the case can result.

The motion is denied.

Allen, J., and Gray, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. App. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabel-v-page-calctapp-1906.