G. Nicholas Mas v. Henry B. Fowler and Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., of Charlotte

Fourth Circuit

G. Nicholas Mas v. Henry B. Fowler and Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., of Charlotte

337 F.2d 414

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1964·No. 9399_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal will be affirmed for we find no abuse of discretion by the District Court.

At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant, appearing pro se, called attention to circumstances which apparently were not known to the District Judge and which might or might not have influenced the action taken. Without expressing an opinion as to this, we point out that there is still time under Rule 60(b) Fed. R.Civ.P. for the matters to be inquired into and for relief to be granted in the discretion of the court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal will be affirmed for we find no abuse of discretion by the District Court.

At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant, appearing pro se, called attention to circumstances which apparently were not known to the District Judge and which might or might not have influenced the action taken. Without expressing an opinion as to this, we point out that there is still time under Rule 60(b) Fed. R.Civ.P. for the matters to be inquired into and for relief to be granted in the discretion of the court.

Affirmed.

G. Nicholas Mas v. Henry B. Fowler and Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., of Charlotte, 337 F.2d 414 (4th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

337 F.2d 414 (G. Nicholas Mas v. Henry B. Fowler and Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Inc., of Charlotte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related