G-M Associates v. Aldo Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

G-M Associates v. Aldo Realty Co.

59 A.D.2d 733, 398 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 733 (G-M Associates v. Aldo Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

G-M Associates v. Aldo Realty Co., 59 A.D.2d 733, 398 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 17, 1977, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying its motion to dismiss the action' for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Service upon a partnership may be effected by personal delivery to a partner, or by service under CPLR 308 (subds 2, 3, 4 or 5) (see 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 310.02). Italian Colony Rest, v Wershals (45 AD2d 841) is not to the contrary. The service in Italian Colony was an attempt to effect personal delivery upon a partner under CPLR 308 (subd 1) by serving a secretary. There was no concomitant mailing (see CPLR 308, subd 2). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 17, 1977, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying its motion to dismiss the action' for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Service upon a partnership may be effected by personal delivery to a partner, or by service under CPLR 308 (subds 2, 3, 4 or 5) (see 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 310.02). Italian Colony Rest, v Wershals (45 AD2d 841) is not to the contrary. The service in Italian Colony was an attempt to effect personal delivery upon a partner under CPLR 308 (subd 1) by serving a secretary. There was no concomitant mailing (see CPLR 308, subd 2). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 733, 398 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-m-associates-v-aldo-realty-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack