Basaranlar v. Pelham Bay General Hospital

133 A.D.2d 241, 519 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49742
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 31, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for tortious interference with contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), dated January 21, 1986, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the hearing indicates that plaintiff attempted to effectuate personal service on the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital, a partnership, by personally serving an administrative assistant thereof, who was not herself a partner. CPLR 310 provides that "[pjersonal service upon persons conducting a business as a partnership may be made by personally serving the summons * * * upon any one [242]*242of them”. Accordingly Trial Term properly held that personal jurisdiction was not acquired over the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital (see, Italian Colony Rest. v Wershals, 45 AD2d 841; cf., G-M Assocs. v Aldo Realty Co., 59 AD2d 733, lv denied 43 NY2d 648). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Basaranlar v. Pelham Bay General Hospital, 133 A.D.2d 241, 519 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 241 (Basaranlar v. Pelham Bay General Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foy v. 1120 Avenue of the Americas Associates
223 A.D.2d 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)