Basaranlar v. Pelham Bay General Hospital
This text of 133 A.D.2d 241 (Basaranlar v. Pelham Bay General Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for tortious interference with contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), dated January 21, 1986, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the hearing indicates that plaintiff attempted to effectuate personal service on the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital, a partnership, by personally serving an administrative assistant thereof, who was not herself a partner. CPLR 310 provides that "[pjersonal service upon persons conducting a business as a partnership may be made by personally serving the summons * * * upon any one [242]*242of them”. Accordingly Trial Term properly held that personal jurisdiction was not acquired over the defendant Pelham Bay General Hospital (see, Italian Colony Rest. v Wershals, 45 AD2d 841; cf., G-M Assocs. v Aldo Realty Co., 59 AD2d 733, lv denied 43 NY2d 648). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A.D.2d 241, 519 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basaranlar-v-pelham-bay-general-hospital-nyappdiv-1987.