G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage

382 So. 2d 1227, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1979·No. No. GG-308·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

MITCHELL, HENRY CLAY, Jr., Associate Judge.

G & B seeks review of an order of the Division of Beverage finding that one of G & B’s employees violated Section 798.02, Florida Statutes (1977), thereby violating Section 561.29, Florida Statutes (1977), and suspending G & B’s liquor license. We reverse.

There is no competent substantial evidence in the record establishing knowledge on the part of the licensee or any responsible officer or employee thereof of the alleged unlawful conduct of the employees. See Woodbury v. State Beverage Department, 219 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions to the Director of the Division of Beverage, Department of Business Regulation, to rescind the revocation of petitioner’s license.

MILLS, Acting C. J., concurs. SMITH, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage, 382 So. 2d 1227, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

382 So. 2d 1227 (G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruilova v. State
125 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Leisure v. State
429 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Woodruff v. State
384 So. 2d 751 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Mangum v. State
384 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Armstrong v. State
383 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Pittman v. State
382 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)