G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage
375 So. 2d 1083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16632 →
Opinion
Affirmed. Upon considering the briefs, record and oral arguments, and on authority of Pauline v. Lee, 147 So.2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962), and G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. d/b/a Out of Sight v. State of Florida, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage, 366 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage, 375 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
375 So. 2d 1083 (G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pauline v. Lee
147 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
G & B of Jacksonville, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage
366 So. 2d 877 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)