Futia v. Roberts

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 29, 2023·No. 7:23-cv-01774·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK eK ANTHONY J. FUTIA, JR., Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 1774 (VB) JUDGMENT RAYMOND ROBERTS; DOUGLAS O’DONNELL; CHASE BANK; BANK OF GREENE COUNTY; WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK TIMOTHY C. IDONI; and SSA COMMISSIONER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant. □□□ eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 28, 2023, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED. All of plaintiff's claims against all defendants are DISMISSED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Accordingly the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 29, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Futia v. Roberts, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Futia v. Roberts (Futia v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)