FURMAN v. SAUERS
This text of FURMAN v. SAUERS (FURMAN v. SAUERS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CERRONE FURMAN, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner,
v.
DEBRA K. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT NO. 11-4342 ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; and, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2021, upon consideration of Pro Se Petitioner’s Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7) (Document No. 51, filed July 20, 2018) and Response to Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Document No. 55, filed February 12, 2021), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated March 22, 2021, IT IS ORDERED that Pro Se Petitioner’s Application for Relief Seeking Equitable Relief Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)[&](7) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural ruling with respect to pro se petitioner’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
FURMAN v. SAUERS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furman-v-sauers-paed-2021.