Funkhouser v. Loew's, Inc.

108 F. Supp. 476, 96 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 115, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2299
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri
DecidedJuly 30, 1952
DocketNo. 5713
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 F. Supp. 476 (Funkhouser v. Loew's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Funkhouser v. Loew's, Inc., 108 F. Supp. 476, 96 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 115, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2299 (W.D. Mo. 1952).

Opinion

DUNCAN, District Judge.

This is an action between plaintiff, a resident of the State of Kansas, and Loew’s, Incorporated, a Maryland corporation, licensed to do business in the State of Missouri, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendant in the amount of approximately $2,000,000 for alleged violation of his copyright interest in and to a literary composition entitled “Cupid Rides the Rails” and by infringement of his common-law literary rights in and to a literary composition and play in manuscript form entitled “Old John Santa Fe” which it is alleged 'is a dramatization of the original literary composition. entitled “Cupid Rides the Rails.”

The petition is in three counts. The first count claims damages for infringing his rights in and to the literary composition “Cupid Rides the Rails” in the sum of $500,000; the second count as to “Old John Santa Fe” in the sum of $300,000 actual damages, and in the sum of $200,000 punitive damages, alleging that the violation was wilful and malicious; and the third count seeks damages in the sum of $100 for the first infringing performance, and $50 for each subsequent infringing performance, amounting to $1,000,000.

It is alleged that the infringement resulted from the dramatization of the screen play “The Harvey Girls” which was produced and released by the defendant in 1945. Defendant denies that any part of plaintiff’s composition was copied, pirated, appropriated, embodied in or incorporated as part of the novelization of the picture “The Harvey Girls,” and that the dramatization of said picture was an original literary work from the material owned by the defendant.

There is an enormous mass of material before the court which has been reviewed, much of it carefully studied for the purpose of attempting to arrive at a clear understanding of the factual situation raised by the evidence and the claims of the plaintiff. It is estimated that 500,000 words are in evidence in the form of testimony, depositions, manuscripts, novels, etc.

At the time of'the trial of the case, plaintiff was employed by the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company as a conductor. He came from a family of railroad people, his father having 'been an -early day employee of the Santa Fe. Plaintiff also be[478]*478came an employee of the .Santa Fe, and claims that he came within the definition of a “boomer.” A “boomer” apparently was an itinerant early day railroad employee who shifted from place to place and followed the movement of freight upon a seasonal basis; he was unattached, worked when he liked, and roamed when he liked. In “Old John Santa Fe” plaintiff describes him thus:

“His impulses were elementary. Quick to fight, generous to a fault, he’d sob in his beer on hearing a ‘Mother’ song and next instant knock your ears off if you laughed at him about it. He would hand you the shirt off his back— and ‘borrow’ yours just as quickly if he needed it. He took pride in ‘belonging to the human race,’ which to him meant being a regular guy. Financially, it was easy come, easy go with the boomer. But his care-free attitude often served to hide deep inner feelings beneath a cloak of laughing cynicism. Beset by plenty of faults and continually urged on to greener fields by an innate wanderlust, he was, nevertheless, a glamorous character on whom the early railroads reluctantly had to depend to keep the wheels rolling.”

The story “Cupid Rides the Rails” written by Clifford Funkhouser and Lyman Anson was first published by the American Mercury in its September 1940 edition. It was copyrighted, and the copyrights assigned to Funkhouser and Anson.

This is a story of the early development of the Santa Fe Railroad Company west of the Missouri River, and from a reading of it, one would infer that it is based on historical data. It described the boomer, the Santa Fe Railroad, the Fred Harvey system of eating places, and how Fred Harvey “launched a ‘matrimonial bureau.’ ” Its romantic side is largely built around the places along the railroad, and the “Harvey Girls” who were waitresses in the Fred Harvey eating houses.

I cannot escape the conclusion that there was uppermost in the minds of the authors the intent to dramatize the railroad and its employees, rather than the “Harvey Girls.” Their part is fitted into the story largely because they were considered the only decent unattached women in this great undeveloped territorial area. Several places throughout his writing, the plaintiff quotes the “popular boomer slogan” — “No ladies west of Dodge City — No women west of Albuquerque.”

The story “Cupid Rides the Rails” was condensed and published in the November 1940 issue of the Reader’s Digest under the title “Fred Harvey Girls — Civilizers of the Southwest.” Plaintiff claims to have suggested the title, which was adopted by the publishers. The condensed story as published in the Digest is less than two pages, and approximately one-fourth of that space is devoted to a historical description of Fred Harvey as taken from Erna Fergus-son’s “Our Southwest.”

The story as condensed and published in the Digest entitled “Fred Harvey Girls— Civilizers of the Southwest” was largely about the Harvey Girls and the Harvey System, and that portion which was deleted from the story “Cupid Rides the Rails” as published in the American Mercury was largely about the railroad and boomer. As condensed, it contained less than half as many words as the original story “Cupid Rides the Rails.”

“Old John iSanta Fe” also written by Funkhouser and Anson, which plaintiff claims to be a dramatization of “Cupid Rides the Rails” and “The Harvey Girls— Civilizers of the Southwest’’ is also a story dealing very largely with the development of the railroad, and the boomers are the principal characters. It is a typical western story as stated by the defendant’s reader who reviewed it, characterizing boomers instead of cowboys; the usual background of western stories is apparent throughout.

The story begins, as the author says “with the turn of the century” and with the end of the first phase of railroading. He describes the engines of the period, and—

“ * * * the itinerant trainmen who shifted as they followed the crops and other bulges in traffic. It was the era of the short-waisted, long-skirted [479]*479Gibson girl; of hat pins, first Kodaks, scratchy Edi'son phonographs with their ‘morning glory’ horns. It was-the period when nostalgic boomers wept in their beer over ‘After the Ball’, ‘The Baggage Coach Ahead’, and ‘Hello, Central, Give Me Heaven’; when they laughed and sang ‘There’s A Hot Time in the Old Town Tonight’, ‘In the Shade of the Old Apple Tree’, ‘School Days’, etc.”

The period was the beginning of a modern phase of the “dramatic rise of palatial Fred Harvey eating houses,” the boomer slogan “No ladies west of Dodge City, No women west of Albuquerque,” — “the new type waitress imported by Fred Harvey, mostly from the east, had such a revolutionary effect on the lonesome, homesick boomer. To him they looked like angels.” He described them as:

“ * * * very decent young women — • intelligent, good looking and eager for a touch of normal romance if it came their way.”

how they were chaperoned by “house mothers” in charge of each group; “* * Harvey girls were ‘ladies’ indeed.” How they found romance and established an empire; How you saw—

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lake v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
140 F. Supp. 707 (S.D. California, 1956)
Funkhouser v. Loew's, Inc.
208 F.2d 185 (Eighth Circuit, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F. Supp. 476, 96 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 115, 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funkhouser-v-loews-inc-mowd-1952.