Fung v. Hoi
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 20-MAY-2026 03:40 PM Dkt. 20 ODSMR
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
WEI LING FUNG, Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
WA CHAM HOI, Respondent/Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
FUGANG XIA aka SUMMER, Petitioner/Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING MOTION (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of Petitioners’ “Motion for
Clarification or, in the Alternative, Recall of Order Denying Certiorari,” which we construe as a motion for reconsideration
of the order rejecting certiorari filed on April 20, 2026,
Respondent’s opposition, and the record herein,
It is ordered that the Motion is dismissed. See
Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither
acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of
certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in
the supreme court. The rejection of an application for
certiorari shall be final.”).
It is further ordered that Respondent’s request for
attorney fees and costs is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 20, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fung v. Hoi (Fung v. Hoi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.