Fung v. Hoi

• Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
• Decided: February 4, 2026
• Docket: SCWC-23-0000347
• Status: Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 04-FEB-2026 09:09 AM Dkt. 6 ODSAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

WEI LING FUNG, Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

vs.

WA CHAM HOI, Respondent/Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

FUGANG XIA aka SUMMER, Petitioner/Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Castagnetti, assigned by reason of vacancy)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate

Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of

certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)

(2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rule 36(b)(1) (2016), It is ordered that Petitioners’ application for writ

of certiorari, filed February 2, 2026, is dismissed without

prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule

40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be filed within thirty

days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’

judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for

filing the application is extended in accordance with this

rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 4, 2026.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti