Funfar v. Town of Falmouth & Another

103 N.E.3d 772, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1108
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided April 27, 2018·No. 17–P–1048·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs brought this case pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, challenging a decision of the Falmouth zoning board of appeals (ZBA), and seeking an order temporarily ceasing the operation of a wind turbine known as "Wind 2." Summary judgment entered in the defendants' favor, in part under the doctrine of laches. In a separate case, Falmouth v. Falmouth Zoning Bd. of Appeals, No. 1472CV00003 (Barnstable County), a different judge of the Superior Court affirmed the ZBA's decision that Wind 2 (and its sister turbine, Wind 1) constitute a nuisance, and permanently ordered that the turbines cease operation. That decision was not appealed and has become final. As a result, the relief sought by the plaintiffs in this case has already been obtained. We accordingly vacate the judgment in this case, and order the entry of a new judgment dismissing this case as moot. See Aquacultural Research Corp. v. Austin, 88 Mass. App. Ct. 631, 636 (2015).

So ordered.

Vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Funfar v. Town of Falmouth & Another, 103 N.E.3d 772, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (Mass. Ct. App. 2018).

103 N.E.3d 772 (Funfar v. Town of Falmouth & Another) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Falmouth v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Falmouth
113 N.E.3d 933 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2018)