Fuller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fuller v. State

755 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4255, 2000 WL 368567

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fuller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 748 So. 2d 292 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s sentence in all respects. However, the judgment does not provide credit for the 1010 days the defendant served in state prison. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence as to how long the defendant served time in county jail.

Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with directions to correct the judgment crediting the defendant with the time served in state prison and to make a determination as to the amount of time to be credited for time served in the county jail. See Dix v. State, 752 So.2d 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Torres v. State, 717 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s sentence in all respects. However, the judgment does not provide credit for the 1010 days the defendant served in state prison. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence as to how long the defendant served time in county jail.

Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with directions to correct the judgment crediting the defendant with the time served in state prison and to make a determination as to the amount of time to be credited for time served in the county jail. See Dix v. State, 752 So.2d 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Torres v. State, 717 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed and remanded.

Fuller v. State, 755 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4255, 2000 WL 368567 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

755 So. 2d 779 (Fuller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related