Fuller v. State

786 So. 2d 1269, 2001 WL 685836
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2001
Docket2D00-565
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 786 So. 2d 1269 (Fuller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. State, 786 So. 2d 1269, 2001 WL 685836 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

786 So.2d 1269 (2001)

Julie Lynne FULLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D00-565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2001.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Julie Lynn Fuller, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PATTERSON, Chief Judge.

Julie Fuller appeals from her judgment and sentence for conspiracy to commit organized fraud, false application for a driver's license, and unauthorized possession of a driver's license. Fuller's appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence without discussion, but we reverse the restitution order and corrected restitution order and remand for further proceedings.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Fuller pleaded guilty in exchange for a nolle prosequi of an organized fraud charge and for a time-served sentence on the remaining three charges. The plea agreement provided that restitution was to be capped at $11,076.72. Our independent review of the record reveals that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the restitution order or the corrected restitution order because they were rendered after Fuller had filed her notice of appeal. See K.D. v. State, 779 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Edwards v. State, 734 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). In the judgment rendered on December 14, 1999, the space is checked that states, "RESTITUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED ORDER." The trial court, however, did not sign the original restitution order until January 25, 2000, and it was not rendered until February 11, 2000, well after Fuller filed her notice of appeal on December 31, 1999. Therefore, we strike the restitution orders and remand for the trial court to enter a new restitution order.

*1270 Affirmed in part, restitution orders stricken, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
39 So. 3d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Rodriguez v. State
964 So. 2d 833 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Batten v. State
895 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 So. 2d 1269, 2001 WL 685836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.