Fulcher v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Fulcher v. State

82 Miss. 630

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 82 Miss. 630 (Fulcher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fulcher v. State, 82 Miss. 630 (Mich. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The objection that the juror, Narrowitz, was not a qualified voter, but an unnaturalized foreigner, was made too late, being after verdict. Moreover, it nowhere appears, by affidavit or otherwise, that this fact was unknown to the accused or his counsel when the juror was accepted. Const., sec. 264; Tolbert v. State, 71 Miss., 191, 14 South., 462, 42 Am. St. Rep., 454; George v. State, 39 Miss., 570.

[634]*634The court below did not err in its modification of the seventh charge asked by the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The objection that the juror, Narrowitz, was not a qualified voter, but an unnaturalized foreigner, was made too late, being after verdict. Moreover, it nowhere appears, by affidavit or otherwise, that this fact was unknown to the accused or his counsel when the juror was accepted. Const., sec. 264; Tolbert v. State, 71 Miss., 191, 14 South., 462, 42 Am. St. Rep., 454; George v. State, 39 Miss., 570.

[634]*634The court below did not err in its modification of the seventh charge asked by the defendant.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Miss. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulcher-v-state-miss-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack