Fulcher v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston
This text of 59 F. App'x 235 (Fulcher v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because Liberty Life Assurance Co. (“Liberty”) did not respond to James Fulcher’s (“Fulcher”) evidence of fibromyalgia in the second denial letter, we vacate the district court’s decision that Liberty did not abuse its discretion by refusing to provide Fulcher with long-term disability benefits. See Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit Plan, 110 F.3d 1461, 1463 (9th Cir.1997). On remand, the district court is instructed to further remand the case to Liberty so as to permit Fulcher to present a complete and integrated information package supporting his disability claim. Liberty should then give full consideration (including evaluation by experts of its choosing) to Fulcher’s newly submitted evidence.
VACATED and REMANDED with instructions.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F. App'x 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulcher-v-liberty-life-assurance-co-of-boston-ca9-2003.