Fugo v. Brown

6 Vet. App. 162, 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 49, 1994 WL 28699
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided February 3, 1994·No. No. 93-407·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The en banc Court, sua sponte, withdraws its original order issued on February 2,1994, and issues this order in its stead.

On November 16, 1993, a three-judge panel * affirmed the February 18, 1993, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. 6 Vet. App. 40. On November 30, 1993, appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for reconsideration. On December 22, 1993, the three-judge panel denied appellant’s motion for [163] reconsideration. On January 6, 1994, appellant filed a motion for review en banc. Upon consideration of the opinion of the Court and appellant’s motion for review en banc, and it not appearing that review en banc is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s motion for review en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fugo v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 162, 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 49, 1994 WL 28699 (Cal. 1994).

6 Vet. App. 162 (Fugo v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

190401-8135
Board of Veterans' Appeals, 2019
Luallen v. Brown
8 Vet. App. 92 (Veterans Claims, 1995)