Fuentes v. State
707 So. 2d 1192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3153, 1998 WL 144971
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fuentes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 730 So. 2d 366 →
Opinion
Danny Fuentes appeals his sentence, arguing that the trial court erred by imposing costs of prosecution because no agency had requested the imposition of these costs. The State correctly concedes that in accordance with Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc), the trial court erred. We strike the $150 for cost of prosecution. Upon remand, the State may seek assessment of these costs after complying with the applicable statutory procedures. See id. at 119.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuentes v. State, 707 So. 2d 1192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3153, 1998 WL 144971 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
707 So. 2d 1192 (Fuentes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)