Fuentes v. State

707 So. 2d 1192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3153, 1998 WL 144971
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1998
DocketNo. 97-00097
StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 1192 (Fuentes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuentes v. State, 707 So. 2d 1192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3153, 1998 WL 144971 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Danny Fuentes appeals his sentence, arguing that the trial court erred by imposing costs of prosecution because no agency had requested the imposition of these costs. The State correctly concedes that in accordance with Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc), the trial court erred. We strike the $150 for cost of prosecution. Upon remand, the State may seek assessment of these costs after complying with the applicable statutory procedures. See id. at 119.

PARKER, C.J., NORTHCUTT, J., and RONDOLINO, ANTHONY, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 So. 2d 1192, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3153, 1998 WL 144971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuentes-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.