Fryover v. Forbes

439 N.W.2d 284, 176 Mich. App. 36
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1989·No. Docket 102270·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Gillis, J.

Penny Fryover was sixteen weeks pregnant with Karl James Fryover when both were killed because she swerved her vehicle in an attempt to avoid hitting a dog owned by defendants. Plaintiff brought wrongful death suits on behalf of both Penny and Karl. Defendants moved for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10) as to plaintiffs wrongful death suit regarding Karl, claiming that a nonviable fetus is not a person under the wrongful death act. The trial court granted defendants’ motion relying on this Court’s decision in Toth v Goree, 65 Mich App 296; 237 NW2d 297 (1975), lv den 396 Mich 836 (1976). We agree with Judge Maher’s dissent in Toth and, therefore, reverse the trial court’s decision. See also Presley v Newport Hospital, 117 RI 177; 365 A2d 748 (1976).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

M.J. Talbot, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fryover v. Forbes, 439 N.W.2d 284, 176 Mich. App. 36 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989).

439 N.W.2d 284 (Fryover v. Forbes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carr v. Wittingen
451 N.W.2d 584 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1990)
Rademacher v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
737 F. Supp. 427 (E.D. Michigan, 1989)
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metro. Airport
737 F. Supp. 427 (E.D. Michigan, 1989)
Jarvis v. Providence Hospital
444 N.W.2d 236 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1989)
Fryover v. Forbes
439 N.W.2d 284 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1989)